home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: andrew.cmu.edu!bo24+
- From: Berend Ozceri <bo24+@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: FindTask() VERY IMPORTANT
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 12:07:53 -0500
- Organization: Masters student, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Message-ID: <MlDlTdS00iWS45Xc5x@andrew.cmu.edu>
- References: <4hfvff$sj6@werple.net.au> <192.6637T931T2098@academy.bastad.se>?20@ <4hm7qm$otm@news.uni-paderborn.de>
- <4hmpfb$5pi@news.xs4all.nl>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: po7.andrew.cmu.edu
- In-Reply-To: <4hmpfb$5pi@news.xs4all.nl>
-
- Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.amiga.programmer: 7-Mar-96 Re: FindTask()
- VERY IMPORTANT by Marco Nelissen@xs1.xs4al
- > Ralph Schmidt (laire@basis.owl.de) wrote:
- > : Never ever use SysBase->ThisTask for your programs. It will be
- > : banned/forbidden in the next OS release.
- >
- > Says who? Why would a future OS not use this field?
-
- Any changes in the Exec micro-kernel, especially in the scheduler,
- especially leaning towards multiprocessor support would make that field
- obsolete.
-
- Berend Ozceri
- Carnegie Mellon University
-
-